The film, like the play, is set during a
day, after Hester Collyer (Leigh) is found after a failed suicide attempt. Ten
months before the play starts, she abandoned her husband for Freddie, a younger
man, and now is confronted with the eminent ending of that relationship as
well.
The play is compelling and does wonders
with the claustrophobia of the space, and the compression of time, but is
designed as a play. A cinematographic adaptation will never be easy – you keep
the play closed, and it’s not very film-like; or you open it up, which can tear
the play’s fabric apart. The TV adaptation with Penelope Wilton and Colin Firth
falls in the first category, while the 2011 film with Rachel Weisz went in the
second (or at least the 20 minutes or so, I lasted watching it). However, this
film fared better, partly because Rattigan wrote it himself. So instead of
fabricating a whole story of an unhappy marriage (as in the 2011 version, which
created a horrible mother in law), he kept the flashbacks to key moments during
Hester’s affair, and all prior her leaving husband. He also added/developed a
few supporting characters, although I wasn’t entirely convinced he pulled it
off.
More disappointingly, at least to me, the
film lacked the lust between the characters that I saw in the 2008 revival. This
is a key plot point. After all, Hester doesn’t run away with Freddie for a
companionship of minds. Repressed all her life, she finally found a way to
escape her social chains. I understand that censorship was tighter on film (see the moralising tagline), this
absence makes the affair more doomed and less understandable that it should be.
The contemporary reviews praised Kenneth More
for his portrayal of Freddie. I wasn’t particularly impressed. I assume his
casting was due to having originated the part on stage. But Freddie is supposed
to be good looking, or at least extremely charming (Colin Firth was a much
better cast). More was too old, lacking on screen the sex appeal he might have
projected on stage.
On the other hand, Leigh was very good,
much better than I expected. I liked the control in her voice (so unlike
Blanche DuBois, much closer to her younger self), and the occasional fire she
allowed her character to release. There was a close-up towards the end that Litvak
might have borrowed from “Gone with the Wind” and felt a bit out of place.
2 comments:
Good comments, I reviewed this myself recently at:
http://osullivan60.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/lost-and-found-deep-blue-sea-1955_5.html
It had been unavailable for a long time, a friend of mine saw the extra screening at the BFI last night, so I expect his comments later today. I recently got the Terence Rattigan Collection, set of 5 dvds, which includes the Penelope Wilton/Colin Firth production, which I have yet to see. It also has other versions of Separate Tables, The Browning Version and others. The 1983 John Schlesinger version of Separate Tables with Alan Bates, Julie Christie and Claire Bloom is a much better and fuller version of that play that the well-known 1958 film with Deborah Kerr and David Niven.
I did not want to see the Terence Davies version of Deep Blue Sea at all, where he re-writes Rattigan to his own ends.
Thanks for the comment.
I have seen some of the productions in the BBC Rattigan set, but the only one that I really loved was "The Browning Version" with Judi Dench and Ian Holm.
And from memory, the Mr and Mrs Page comes from the play. I assume the implication is that they had to lie to the landlady as otherwise they would have trouble renting the rooms.
Post a Comment