Plot-wise, the film relates the encounters (mostly sexual) between five women and five men, with one of them passing on to the next encounter (thus creating the circle) under the supervising eye of Anton Walbrook, who comments and guides the action, breaking the fourth wall and even cutting the action at moments.Two non-sexual encounters, one at the middle (where a married couple doesn't do together what they do with others) and one at the end (where two of the men cross each other in the street) elegantly provide the axis of symmetry and closure of the circle.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiwBRGmzxI3CNr514esFKCQ-y3QBTVjy8wBkRkzaFjf4ZRpPNDAizlGbrfN98vSrY9zIVhPSUxvTNHp5tVy-ZTwSnVt2I61uKANFuHtWG7KhgD_WOWTGll71I0VE0qwhppXQJ5LfvqmEgfM/s320/La+ronde.jpg)
The second half by contrast, lacks this wit and light touch and feels rushed when it shouldn't (the episodes with the count played by Gérard Philipe and the second with the poet) and drags when it shouldn't (the first episode with the poet). One of the consequences of this, is that the performances seem weaker in the second part and the characters not properly developed (the count and the actress in particular) . There's also less interaction of Walbrook with the female characters than earlier on, which he had done so well with Simone Signoret and Simone Simon. I really feel something is missing in what should have been a perfect circle. I understand that there is a longer version of the film which may solve this, but as at the moment it seems to be hidden from view. It might be that this version will be the one that makes me love this film.
The film's cast is a veritable who's who of European actors, mostly French, of the time (the ones I mentioned plus Isa Miranda, and Jean-Louis Barrault, from "Les Enfants du Paradis"). But my favourite has to be Daniel Gélinas the young man, bringing a keen embarrassing to the role that you can't help but relate to. It got two Oscar nominations, for best art direction and best screenplay co-written by Ophüls himself.
1 comment:
Miguel, I saw this probably more than 30 years ago, and have always remembered being very impressed - must give it another look! Glad to hear that you enjoyed it more on the second viewing, though it sounds as if the cutting has done some damage.
Post a Comment